Most Active Stories
- 1,400 Confirmed Dead In Nepal After Powerful Earthquake
- Spiked Cabbage And Blown Glass Among Attractions At Annual Oklahoma City Festival
- Landis: Saudi Arabia's New King Has Helped Put Syria's Assad On The Ropes
- Supreme Court To Hear Oklahoma Execution Protocol: Here's What You Need To Know
- How The 1970s Changed The Role Of Human Rights In U.S. Foreign Policy
Fri April 18, 2014
Putin – Peter The Great Redux, Or A Modern-Day James Monroe?
After hours of negotiations Thursday, top diplomats from the United States, Europe, and Russia agreed to halt any violence, intimidation or provocative actions in Ukraine.
University of Oklahoma historian Joshua Landis, a regular contributor to KGOU’s World Views, says a Ukrainian use of military force could provoke a Russian counterattack, but Putin still has his eye on Eastern provinces.
"The phase that Putin used that struck me is, he said, ‘This is new Russia,’” Landis says. “Kharkov, Lugansk, Donetsk, Odessa were not part of Ukraine in Tsarist times.”
Landis says the region has had a revolving door of claimants since Peter the Great took large portions of Ukraine and Poland during the early 18th Century. The region was later divided between Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Habsburg Empire and Russia before World War I.
“Ukraine got sucked up again in the Second World War, and spit out again,” Landis says. “We just saw Yugoslavia get chopped up into seven countries. Czechoslovakia split into two. This could mean a separation of Ukraine between Russians and Ukrainians.”
For Americans having trouble understanding Russia’s three century-fixation on Eastern Europe, compare it to the United States’ 200-year-old Monroe Doctrine.
“Whenever a foreign power has gotten too close to Latin America, we say, ‘Keep out! This is our zone,’” Landis says. “In a sense, Russia is saying that about Ukraine.
But Russia’s interest in Ukraine already has had severe economic consequences. Inflation is on the rise, their currency and stock market are declining, prices are up, wages are low, and billions of dollars of capital are leaving Russia.
Suzette Grillot, the Dean of the University of Oklahoma’s College of International Studies, says even though consumer confidence is declining along with the public’s faith in Russia’s economy, there’s still significant support for Putin’s land grab.
“He has the highest popularity ratings and approval ratings of all time, right now, so that historical connection seems to be very real,” Grillot says. “But there is a disconnect between historical connection and their actual economic, physical well-being today.”
KGOU relies on voluntary contributions from readers and listeners to further its mission of public service with internationally focused analysis for Oklahoma and beyond. To contribute to our efforts, make your donation online, or contact our Membership department.